
Abstract:
The traffic statistics for YouTube are staggering. With over 60 hours of video uploaded every minute, or one hour of video uploaded to YouTube every second and over 800 million unique visitors a month. (Statistics, n.d.). It is likely that YouTube will be a force in education in the future with more and more schools gaining access to the Internet. Although there are a wide variety of digital tools that will impact education technology, my paper will highlight the use of YouTube to assist instructors and help students learn more. This paper will explain how YouTube can benefit the student by allowing them to learn at their own pace and have more one-on-one time with the instructor to create more of a mentor/mentee relationship. As a photography instructor myself, I will also explain how it worked for me in my Los Angeles camera club.
Introducing YouTube:
Recently at Florida International University Professor, David Wernick was trying to come up with new ways to keep his student management class sharp and ready to learn skills that would help students be competitive in the job market upon graduation.
The class featured regular group debates about business trends, ethics and historical controversies. Students listened to opponents' opening arguments and then had to craft a rebuttal
A new way of teaching the same subject matter, Wernick decided, would be to have the teams video introductions and opening arguments and post them on YouTube for their opponents to watch. The opponents would then have time to craft a thought-out response before class met the next day. This allowed not only more thought out arguments the next day, but also more time for the teachers to critique the students (Cardine, 2008).
In high school and middle school, a small group of teachers nationwide is replacing in-class lectures with short online videos that students watch at home. This flip-flop of homework and lecture — from which the model gets its name, the “flipped classroom” — leaves class time open for students to complete their assignments with their teacher standing by to offer one-on-one help.
The Indiana Department of Education wants to see if the model can work and John Keller the assistant superintendent for technology says, “we’ve heard about kids powering down when they come to school, and so any model that has a potential for increased engagement, for the relevance of school to increase for kids, I think that’s something that demands a second look.” (Stokes, 2011)
The education community has a responsibility to properly prepare students for the technological world. Mullen & Wedwick writes that “because NCLB states that every student should be technologically literate by the eighth grade, schools must focus their efforts on bridging the gap between the traditional definition of literacy and technologies” (cited by Witte, 2007). Being literate no longer only involves being able to read and write. The literate of the twenty-first century must be able to download, upload, rip, burn, chat, save, blog, Skype, IM, and share. (Mullen & Wedwick, 2008).
Troy Cockrum, a middle school English teacher at St. Thomas Aquinas in Indianapolis decided to flip two of his classes. He posts five-minute lectures he records at home to his YouTube page, instructing students how to write a five-paragraph essay. The dynamics of the class have changed in several ways. Students can watch the lectures at their own pace and then Cockrum is available to help students individually during class. “Most people go into it thinking the biggest part is making the videos. But really, the biggest part is what you do with your class time now that you have that free time,” Cockrum says. (Stokes, 2008).
Andre Mercer teaches music in Canada and also via the Internet to high school students living in rural and isolated communities of Newfoundland and Labrador. He explains that YouTube also serves as a supplemental tool. “I’ll look that up on YouTube later,” is a comment often heard by his students as they touch on different musical topics. (Mercer, pg. 43, 2011).
At another high school in San Diego, Martin Casas teaches advanced placement history and freshman geography. Casas has helped prepare students for college placement tests by asking them to view two video clips and answer questions based on the synthesis of both. "They're responding to something more dynamic when they see a video clip," he added. "They're more involved and excited with the material." (Cardine, 2011)
YouTube has been included in a recent Web site banning trend among many school districts. There are highly inappropriate videos available on the site. Instead of eliminating this resource from the education community, administrators, teachers, and students need to be taught how to use this valuable tool. (Mullen & Wedwick p. 66, 2008).
YouTube In Action:
I am a part-time photography instructor at local camera store in Westwood, California. I work with individuals who have just bought a high-end camera and show them how it works and what lenses to use. I have also created a photography club called Street Safari Saturdays. The main focus of my club is to discuss a topic of photography and then go to a specific destination in Los Angeles and implement what I’ve discussed at our meeting. Last week, I decided to try something new. I have 56 participants in my club and prior to our meeting at my studio I created a YouTube video regarding the topic that I wanted everyone to focus on. My video was about three minutes long and the topic was depth-of-field.
All right, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up:
When I first set up the camera in my studio I found myself getting a little nervous about how I was going to present my topic. I had my notes in my hand and after the third take I felt satisfied with my performance. During the editing process, I was able to put in a few examples of depth-of-field that emphasized what works in a good depth-of-field photograph and why. Uploading the video was a lot easier than I thought it would be and YouTube makes it easy for anyone to create a channel. I sent out an e-mail to everyone in the club and I also asked all participants to send me any photos that they liked that showed good examples of depth-of-field and why they liked it. This was the first time I asked them to write their opinions in an e-mail as to what about a photo they did or didn’t like before we met at a location.
Our meeting place last Saturday was the Griffith Park Observatory. This is an iconic landmark in Silverlake and very photogenic and has been used in many movies; the most notorious is the James Dean/Natalie Wood masterpiece, “Rebel Without a Cause.” Almost immediately, we were able to start talking about depth-of-field. Of the eighteen participants who attended, only one person was not able to watch the video because her Internet access was down and she was unable to get to another computer to watch the video. Everyone else said they watched the video and the comments were mostly positive. There are many DVDs that explain depth-of-field and how to use it but they’re very long and tedious to watch. What my students appreciated about was my video was that it was only about three minutes long and then we were going to meet to discuss the topic more when we were on location. I was also told that because they knew me, it was much easier to watch then just someone they had randomly found on YouTube explaining depth-of-field. The most positive thing that came from the YouTube instruction was that my students already had a basic understanding of depth-of-field and when we were on location I was able to work one-on-one and refer to the video. And the last and I feel the most important result from my YouTube instruction was there were many members who were not able to make my photo shoot at Griffith Park and they still participated. I thought this was the best part about the video – even though they were unable to come to the shoot, many members sent me examples of photos that they took after hearing my explanation.
Conclusion:
It used to be that the quality of video was terrible and using video technology for instructional purposes was a disaster because students paid more attention to the quality of the video rather than the information being presented. However, the quality is no more an issue and YouTube now supports High Definition (HD) video so anyone can produce broadcast quality videos. Also, thanks to reality TV most people are used to the camera shaking or things not being scripted and I have found my students actually prefer it. I don’t think technology or YouTube will ever take the place of a good teacher and teachers will have to create their own videos to supplement their lessons. YouTube and the Internet are not going away and to be a successful teacher and have more engaged students - technology and YouTube needs to be embraced. (Pros and Cons of You Tube, n.d.).
References
Pros and Cons of YouTube. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.surfnetkids.com/go/safety/170/pros-and-cons-of-youtube/
Mercer, A. (2011). The Educational Uses of YouTube. Canadian Music Educator / Musicien Educateur Au Canada, 52(3), 42-43.
Mullen, R., & Wedwick, L. (2008). Avoiding the Digital Abyss: Getting Started in the Classroom with YouTube, Digital Stories, and Blogs. Clearing House, 82(2), 66-69.
Retrieved from: http://www.surfnetkids.com/go/safety/170/pros-and-cons-of-youtube/
Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics
Stokes, K. (2011). How YouTube Is Changing The Classroom. Retrieved from: http://stateimpact.npr.org/indiana/2011/10/12/how-youtube-is-changing-the-classroom/
Cardine, S. (2008). Is Education Ready For YouTube? Retrieved from: http://www.convergemag.com/edtech/Is-Education-Ready-For-YouTube.html

